Classify different methods of irrigation stating suitability of each under different situations of crop, water and soil conditions?


Irrigation methods

Many different methods are used by farmers to irrigate crops. They range from watering individual plants from a can of water to highly automated irrigation by a centre pivot system. However, from the point of wetting the soil, these methods can be grouped under five headings, namely:irrigation method

  1. Flood irrigation – water is applied over the entire field to infiltrate into the soil (e.g. wild flooding, contour flooding, borders, basins, etc.).
  2. Furrow irrigation – water is applied between ridges (e.g. level and graded furrows, contour furrows, corrugations, etc.). Water reaches the ridge, where the plant roots are concentrated, by capillary action.

Sprinkler irrigation – water is applied in the form of a spray and reaches the soil very much like rain (e.g. portable and solid set sprinklers, travelling sprinklers, spray guns, centre-pivot systems, etc.). The rate of application is adjusted so that it does not create ponding of water on the surface.

  1. Sub-irrigation – water is applied beneath the root zone in such a manner that it wets the root zone by capillary rise (e.g. subsurface irrigation canals, buried pipes, etc.). Deep surface canals or buried pipes are used for this purpose.
  2. Localized irrigation – water is applied around each plant or a group of plants so as to wet locally and the root zone only (e.g. drip irrigation, bubblers, micro-sprinklers, etc.). The application rate is adjusted to meet evapotranspiration needs so that percolation losses are minimized.

Choosing an Irrigation Method

To choose an irrigation method, the farmer must know the advantages and disadvantages of the various methods. He or she must know which method suits the local conditions best. Unfortunately, in many cases there is no single best solution: all methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Testing of the various methods – under the prevailing local conditions – provides the best basis for a sound choice of irrigation method.

A. Surface, Sprinkler or Drip Irrigation

The suitability of the various irrigation methods, i.e. surface, sprinkler or drip irrigation, depends mainly on the following factors:

  1. Natural conditions
  2. Type of crop
  3. Type of technology
  4. Previous experience with irrigation
  5. Required labour inputs
  6. Costs and benefits

1. Natural Conditions

The natural conditions such as soil type, slope, climate, water quality and availability, have the following impact on the choice of an irrigation method:

Soil Type: Sandy soils have a low water storage capacity and a high infiltration rate. They therefore need frequent but small irrigation applications, in particular when the sandy soil is also shallow. Under these circumstances, sprinkler or drip irrigation are more suitable than surface irrigation. On loam or clay soils all three irrigation methods can be used, but surface irrigation is more commonly found. Clay soils with low infiltration rates are ideally suited to surface irrigation. When a variety of different soil types is found within one irrigation scheme, sprinkler or drip irrigation are recommended as they will ensure a more even water distribution.

Slope: Sprinkler or drip irrigation are preferred above surface irrigation on steeper or unevenly sloping lands as they require little or no land levelling. An exception is rice grown on terraces on sloping lands.

Climate: Strong wind can disturb the spraying of water from sprinklers. Under very windy conditions, drip or surface irrigation methods are preferred. In areas of supplementary irrigation, sprinkler or drip irrigation may be more suitable than surface irrigation because of their flexibility and adaptability to varying irrigation demands on the farm.

Water Availability: Water application efficiency is generally higher with sprinkler and drip irrigation than surface irrigation and so these methods are preferred when water is in short supply. However, it must be remembered that efficiency is just as much a function of the irrigator as the method used.

Water Quality: Surface irrigation is preferred if the irrigation water contains much sediment. The sediments may clog the drip or sprinkler irrigation systems. If the irrigation water contains dissolved salts, drip irrigation is particularly suitable, as less water is applied to the soil than with surface methods. Sprinkler systems are more efficient that surface irrigation methods in leaching out salts.

2. Type of Crop

Surface irrigation can be used for all types of crops. Sprinkler and drip irrigation, because of their high capital investment per hectare, are mostly used for high value cash crops, such as vegetables and fruit trees. They are seldom used for the lower value staple crops. Drip irrigation is suited to irrigating individual plants or trees or row crops such as vegetables and sugarcane. It is not suitable for close growing crops (e.g. rice).

3. Type of Technology

The type of technology affects the choice of irrigation method. In general, drip and sprinkler irrigation are technically more complicated methods. The purchase of equipment requires high capital investment per hectare. To maintain the equipment a high level of ‘know-how’ has to be available, Also, a regular supply of fuel and spare parts must be maintained which – together with the purchase of equipment – may require foreign currency. Surface irrigation systems – in particular small-scale schemes – usually require less sophisticated equipment for both construction and maintenance (unless pumps are used). The equipment needed is often easier to maintain and less dependent on the availability of foreign currency.

4. Previous Experience with Irrigation

The choice of an irrigation method also depends on the irrigation tradition within the region or country. Introducing a previously unknown method may lead to unexpected complications. It is not certain that the farmers will accept the new method. The servicing of the equipment may be problematic and the costs may be high compared to the benefits.

s8684e0sFigure 65. Surface irrigation requires a high labour input

Often it will be easier to improve the traditional irrigation method than to introduce a totally new method.

5. Required Labour Inputs

Surface irrigation often requires a much higher labour input – for construction, operation and maintenance – than sprinkler or drip irrigation (Figure 65). Surface irrigation requires accurate land levelling, regular maintenance and a high level of farmers’ organization to operate the system. Sprinkler and drip irrigation require little land levelling; system operation and maintenance are less labour-intensive.


Before choosing an irrigation method, an estimate must be made of the costs and benefits of the available options. On the cost side not only the construction and installation, but also the operation and maintenance (per hectare) should be taken into account. These costs should then be compared with the expected benefits (yields). It is obvious that farmers will only be interested in implementing a certain method if they consider this economically attractive. Cost/benefit analysis is, however, beyond the scope of this manual.

In conclusion: surface irrigation is by far the most widespread irrigation method. It is normally used when conditions are favourable: mild and regular slopes, soil type with medium to low infiltration rate, and a sufficient supply of surface or groundwater. In the case of steep or irregular slopes, soils with a very high infiltration rate or scarcity of water, sprinkler and drip irrigation may be more appropriate. When introducing sprinkler and drip irrigation it must be ensured that the equipment can be maintained.

B. Basin, Furrow or Border Irrigation

This section discusses some of the important factors which should be taken into account when determining which surface irrigation method is most suitable: basin, furrow or border irrigation. Again, it is not possible to give specific guidelines leading to a single best solution; each option has its advantages and disadvantages.

Factors to be taken into account include:

  1. Natural circumstances (slope, soil type)
  2. Type of crop
  3. Required depth of irrigation application
  4. Level of technology
  5. Previous experience with irrigation
  6. Required labour inputs

1. Natural Circumstamces

Flat lands, with a slope of 0.1% or less, are best suited for basin irrigation: little land levelling will be required. If the slope is more than 1%, terraces can be constructed. However, the amount of land levelling can be considerable. Furrow irrigation can be used on flat land (short, near horizontal furrows), and on mildly sloping land with a slope of maximum 0.5%. On steeper sloping land, contour furrows can be used up to a maximum land slope of 3%. A minimum slope of 0.05% is recommended to assist drainage. Border irrigation can be used on sloping land up to 2% on sandy soil and 5% on clay soil. A minimum slope of 0.05% is recommended to ensure adequate drainage. Surface irrigation may be difficult to use on irregular slopes as considerable land levelling may be required to achieve the required land gradients. All soil types, except coarse sand with an infiltration rate of more than 30 mm/hour, can be used for surface irrigation. If the infiltration rate is higher than 30 mm/hour, sprinkler or drip irrigation should be used.

2. Type of Crop

Paddy rice is always grown in basins. Many other crops can also be grown in basins: e.g. maize, sorghum, trees, etc. Those crops that cannot stand a very wet soil for more than 12-24 hours should not be grown in basins. Furrow irrigation is best used for irrigating row crops such as maize, vegetables and trees. Border irrigation is particularly suitable for close growing crops such as alfalfa, but border irrigation can also be used for row crops and trees.

3. Required Depth of Irrigation Application

When the irrigation schedule has been determined it is known how much water (in mm) has to be given per irrigation application. It must be checked that this amount can indeed be given, with the irrigation method under consideration. Field experience has shown that most water can be applied per irrigation application when using basin irrigation, less with border irrigation and least with furrow irrigation. In practice, in small-scale irrigation projects, usually 40-70 mm of water are applied in basin irrigation, 30-60 mm in border irrigation and 20-50 mm in furrow irrigation. (In large-scale irrigation projects, the amounts of water applied may be much higher.) This means that if only little water is to be applied per application, e.g. on sandy soils and a shallow rooting crop, furrow irrigation would be most appropriate. (However, none of the surface irrigation methods can be used if the sand is very coarse, i.e. if the infiltration rate is more than 30 mm/hour). If, on the other hand, a large amount of irrigation water is to be applied per application, e.g. on a clay soil and with a deep rooting crop, border or basin irrigation would be more appropriate. The above considerations have been summarized in Table 5. The net irrigation application values used are only a rough guide. They result from a combination of soil type and rooting depth. For example: if the soil is sandy and the rooting depth of the crop is medium, it is estimated that the net depth of each irrigation application will be in the order of 35 mm. The last column indicates which irrigation method is most suitable. In this case medium furrows or short borders.

4. Level of Technology

Basin irrigation is the simplest of the surface irrigation methods. Especially if the basins are small, they can be constructed by hand or animal traction. Their operation and maintenance is simple (see Figure 66). Furrow irrigation – with the possible exception of short, level furrows -requires accurate field grading. This is often done by machines. The maintenance – ploughing and furrowing – is also often done by machines. This requires skill, organization and frequently the use of foreign currency for fuel, equipment and spare parts.

Table 5. Selection of an Irrigation method based on the depth of the Net Irrigation Application

fig.66s8684e0tFigure 66. Land levelling using animal traction

Short, level furrows – also called furrow basins – can, like basins, be constructed and maintained by hand. Borders require the highest level of sophistication. They are constructed and maintained by machines. The grading needs to be accurate. Machine operation requires a high level of skill, organization and usually foreign currency.

5. Previous Experience with Irrigation

If there is no tradition in irrigation, the most simple irrigation method to introduce is basin irrigation. The smaller the basins, the easier their construction, operation and maintenance. If irrigation is used traditionally, it is usually simpler to improve the traditional irrigation method than it is to introduce a previously unknown method.

6. Required Labour Inputs

The required labour inputs for construction and maintenance depend heavily on the extent to which machinery is used. In general it can be stated that to operate the system, basin irrigation requires the least labour and the least skill. For the operation of furrow and border irrigation systems more labour is required combined with more skill.

Comments are closed.